Source visibility
Every output should make it clear which data are official, which are derived and which are contextual support layers.
TerraNava’s methodological position is simple: public-facing technical work must make sources, service levels, uncertainty and limits explicit. That is the only way to keep outputs useful and defensible.
Not a black box
Outputs should always be read as structured interpretations, not as unquestionable truth. Technical judgment, field validation and institutional context still matter.
The same rules apply whether TerraNava is working on a narrative diagnosis, a public-facing map, a technical briefing or a support tool.
Every output should make it clear which data are official, which are derived and which are contextual support layers.
Users must understand what a result can support: quick screening, technical comparison, territorial diagnosis or institutional communication.
TerraNava does not present indicative outputs as if they replaced fieldwork, legal cartography or calibrated modelling.
Service levels help separate exploratory reading from stronger technical outputs. That prevents overclaiming and keeps HydroRisk and related work institutionally credible.
Useful for first-pass territorial reading, prioritisation and public explanation. Not equivalent to formal design work.
Useful for more consistent comparison, technical framing and institutional dialogue when the data basis is strong enough.
Reserved for outputs that require more direct interpretation, validation, custom framing or stronger data conditions.
The public-facing stack combines official hydrological, climatic and cartographic references with documented support layers. The point is not to list everything, but to make the logic legible.
Used when TerraNava needs public and technically defensible reference frames for water, climate and territorial risk.
Useful for multiscale basin reading, drainage structure and comparable territorial interpretation.
Used for map context, visual support and territorial continuity when an official geometry is not the core analytical layer.
TerraNava distinguishes information from official sources, calculated results, demonstrative materials and components that remain pending.
Official status always belongs to the original source. TerraNava calculations and selections are identified as derived.
Information published by the responsible authority, retaining version, coverage and attribution.
An indicator, intersection, synthesis or visual produced from identified sources and documented rules.
Material showing a capability or method; it is not an official diagnosis or a commissioned result.
A source, datum or validation not yet integrated. A missing value is never automatically treated as zero.
Documentation for identifying origin, transformation, scope and limitations.
Status and version records prevent unfinished work from being presented as complete.
Rules on technical integrity, privacy and access.
Identify the page, datum or version, explain the issue and provide a verifiable reference where available. TerraNava records the review and publishes a correction when it affects a public output.
Submit a correction