Source visibility
Every output should make it clear which data are official, which are derived and which are contextual support layers.
TerraNava’s methodological position is simple: public-facing technical work must make sources, service levels, uncertainty and limits explicit. That is the only way to keep outputs useful and defensible.
Outputs should always be read as structured interpretations, not as unquestionable truth. Technical judgment, field validation and institutional context still matter.
The same rules apply whether TerraNava is working on a narrative diagnosis, a public-facing map, a technical briefing or a support tool.
Every output should make it clear which data are official, which are derived and which are contextual support layers.
Users must understand what a result can support: quick screening, technical comparison, territorial diagnosis or institutional communication.
TerraNava does not present indicative outputs as if they replaced fieldwork, legal cartography or calibrated modelling.
Service levels help separate exploratory reading from stronger technical outputs. That prevents overclaiming and keeps HydroRisk and related work institutionally credible.
Useful for first-pass territorial reading, prioritisation and public explanation. Not equivalent to formal design work.
Useful for more consistent comparison, technical framing and institutional dialogue when the data basis is strong enough.
Reserved for outputs that require more direct interpretation, validation, custom framing or stronger data conditions.
The public-facing stack combines official hydrological, climatic and cartographic references with documented support layers. The point is not to list everything, but to make the logic legible.
Used when TerraNava needs public and technically defensible reference frames for water, climate and territorial risk.
Useful for multiscale basin reading, drainage structure and comparable territorial interpretation.
Used for map context, visual support and territorial continuity when an official geometry is not the core analytical layer.